Book :' The Messenger '

Khadijah thought of seeking the opinion of her cousin, the Christian Waraqah ibn Nawfal. She went to him [ whether alone or with the Prophet is not clear ] and told him of Muhammad's experience. Waraqah recognized the signs he had been waiting for and answered without hesitation :
"Holy ! Holy ! By He who holds Waraqah's soul, it is the sublime Namus [ the friend of the secrets of Supreme Royalty, the angel bringing the sacred revelation ] who has come to Muhammad; the same who had come to Mosses. Indeed, Muhammad is the prophet of this people."


Later, during an encounter with Muhammad near the Kaabah, Waraqah was to add:
" You will certainly be called a liar, ill-treated, banished, and attacked. If I am alive then, God knows I will support you in His cause to victory! " Aishah reports that  Waraqah also said:
"Your people will will turn you away !" This startled the Prophet, and he asked:
"Will they turn me away?" Waraqah warned him:
" Indeed they will. No man has ever brought what you have brought and not been treated as an enemy!"


The Prophet's mission had only just began, and already he was allowed to grasp some of the fundamentals of the final Revelation as well as some of the truths that had been present throughout the history of prophecies among peoples............... 


exceprt from Tariq Ramadan's 'The Messenger : The Meanings of the Life of Muhammad'
Tariq Ramadan, a leading Muslim scholar, with a large following especially among young European and American Muslims. In his book, written for a wide audience, he offers a biography of the Prophet Muhammad, highlighting the spiritual and ethical teachings of one of the most influential figures in human history.
If you ask me, 'a bloody good read', even for the non-committed.




Related topics in the blog :
..A European Muslim
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2009/09/european-muslim-prof-tariq-ramadan.html
..Tariq Mehanna
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2012/04/tarek-mehanna.html
..Tan Sri, Let Us Use The ISA !
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2008/05/pearls-and-gem-from-from-surah-abasa.html

How I Came To Islam...Abdur Rahim Green

" I come from  a place where there are Muslims but no Islam to your place where there is Islam but no Muslim.."
 Iqbal on visiting Paris many  years ago ,at the turn of the last century.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIURcB-YdNA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=zA3CNZ6aJnU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iJx_Qpt5Ro&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tu-xw_f-7U&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BICe3rh2fk0&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLbHHM69EjY&feature=relmfu

Surah Al-Ikhlas
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful

Say: He is Allah, the One! (1) Allah, the eternally Besought of all! (2)He begetteth not nor was begotten. (3) And there is none comparable unto Him. (4)

translation of the Holy Quran by Pickthal, surah al ikhlas, 112 : 1-4

Your God is One God; there is no God save Him, the Beneficent, the Merciful. (163) Lo! In the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the difference of night and day, and the ships which run upon the sea with that which is of use to men, and the water which Allah sendeth down from the sky, thereby reviving the earth after its death, and dispersing all kinds of beasts therein, and (in) the ordinance of the winds, and the clouds obedient between heaven and earth: are signs (of Allah's Sovereignty) for people who have sense. (164) 

translation of the Holy Quran by Pickthal, surah al Baqarah, The Cow, 2 : 163 - 164

Post Script :

A  ' husnul khatimah ' ending for Mr Green Senior, Alhamdullillah.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsAVcJXvrCU&feature=fvwre




Related topics on the blog :
'Death and Dying revisited,'
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2011/04/death-and-dying-revisitedsteps-to.html
'Being Able to say Shahada on your Deathbed is an Absolute Rarity,  my friend !...Or Some of My Random Thots on Death
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2008/05/some-more-random-thots-on-death.html

Happiness Revisited

The great sufi saint of the tabi'in era, just one  or two generations after Prophet Muhammad [ pbuh] and the sahabi period, Hasan Al Basri concluded  rather abruptly that tranquility, happiness and contentment in this life and the afterlife rest on three things :

1. Recitation of the Quran

2. Solat 

3. Zikrullah

Must have sound rather  too simplistic to most  of us present day Muslims,  mildly, partially or totally 'disconnected' from the Din or otherwise.. He was of course addressing  Muslims of his century, the 8th  or 7th century or so, where doing all the basic 5 pillars of Islam were a matter of routine. 'Nominal Muslims' were  non existent and if they exist, regarded as  kuffar or worse, bottom of the  heap 'Munafikun'.

This is the 21st century. Nominal Muslims  and the so called 'Munafik' rule and dominate the Muslim hinterland interfacing with the Western world. Values have changed. Human rights. Animal rights. Green right. All rights except God's right...The world has become godless. Political correctness is the order of the day. This is the 'period' when wrongs become right and rights become inordinately wrong.


Even when people of religion discuss 'happiness' with the rest of the world, it has to be 'laced' and sugar coated with 'honey' and the right PC. Otherwise the United Nations and the whole might of the Security Council will come 'homing' on them in due course !
 [ see ' On tranquility, happiness and contentment : An Emory University discourse with His Holiness, the Dalai Lama, Prof  Hoessien Nasr,  His Honourable, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sack  and Rev Schorri ....http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-tranquility-happiness-and.html  ]

I have practically gone 'around the world' studying and researching on the nature of happiness. Have read Holiness Dalai Lama's book on 'Happiness' and found him quite hollow. Listened to gurus and self proclaimed expert on lifestlye . All lacking substance and direction, most totally lost.

Listened to hundreds of lectures on 'tranquility and contentment', listened to various professors and philosophers. All seemed only to concentrate on the now and here. Those who believe in a tomorrow beyond today, got themselves lost in the central issue of God and minor gods !

Certainly happiness and tranquility has nothing to do with your position in life or how much money you have in the bank.

One can be the president of USA, or a powerful figure in a nation state or a sultan with  absolute power, with hundreds at one's beck and call. 

One can have a Bentley Turbo and a fleet of Mercs and Porches in the garage and a trophy wife waiting in bed.  But happiness may still be elusive. In fact these symbols  of success could guarantee one a real big headache if one lack the knowledge and the wisdom to handle them.  We would be wise to be reminded by what Prophet Mosses [ pbuh ], had to say about the age of affluence to the Israelites  following the end of years of hardship after the exodus  from Egypt :


 "Affluence is the  preamble of heedlessness, disbelieve and misplaced pride".

At the personal level I have 'experimented' myself with zikr, in the depth of the ocean bed, zikr hours and hours  in endurance riding on the back of a galloping horse over hills and dales. I have even wokened up in the wee hours of the morning to experience the bliss of solitude and prayer. Had read volumes of tafseer and books.....these 'experiments', all to no avail, if the heart is not there.

Happiness is not on the hills  or dales or in books or volumes of quran......it is just there in one's heart to be rediscovered !

At the end of the day, I have to conclude, on matters of the heart, and indeed tranquility, contentment and happiness are things of the heart, we have to give it ,to the sufis who practice 'experiential Islam'. that indeed the sufi saint, Hassan Al Basri, had got it right.

For all the professors , philosophers and people who are expert at weaving words and phrases in this world, from our perspective as Muslims at least, the 'keys to the garden' remained only in three  magic words:

Recite the Quran [ Iqra ], Solat, Zikr.

It is for all of us to just discover them on our very own individual  life journey  !

Mekkah and Medinah geographically are situated in Saudi Arabia, but for those who have arrive, these two venerated places of worship should be in one's heart !

on recitation of the Quran:

[Yususf Estes]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jhkbwj5yNyo

[Mufti Menk of Zimbabawe]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=hJZi1Txle6o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EszS9pv2iK4&feature=relmfu

on solat:

[Mukhtar Al  Magraoui]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khgqQWuDBqs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL5UXdd4F1s&feature=related

on zikr :

[Yasir Qadhi]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUScyrbvqxg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0lLPowOqqI&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpM1d3BZKl0&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG24gr9UPoU&feature=relmfu

Tarek Mehanna....................

"..a successful war correspondent has to write with honesty, passion and anger..."
Robert Fisk




Reading Glenn Greenwald's  article on Tarek Mehanna, makes one unsure whether it is safe anymore for anyone to be a Muslim in the US.?

Makes one  wonder whether all those pious ,bearded Muslims praying 5 times a day dutifully at their dilapidated mosques in mid America or elsewhere in the USA, are not already on the FBI supercomputers list somewhere. And whether all their sms's, emails and private conversations, all 'wired up ' ,monitored,and sieved through like a comb, looking for key words and suspicious nuances ?

Whether really all this 'bullshit' about  'exported' democracy and freedom of thought and belief which seem to be sacrosanct in 'the Land of the Free' really can hold water?
Whether it is safe and fair anymore for the world to be lead and influenced  by a myopic administration centred in Washington?

Whether the greatest monolithic superpower in the world is crazy enough  to run a protracted undeclared  and 'asymmetric 'war with 1.5 billion Muslims ?  To increasingly many now, and daily ever increasing number, USA has already declared such a war long time ago. And I do not blame them. Muslims are being killed and mutilated like dogs all around the world by USA tanks and bullets, drones and non drones, directly and indirectly, openly and covertly,by USA armies and non armies , by proxies and friends.

Whether a contrararion 'Ghandian' view in a Muslim's private life is to be considered a  deadly 'viral contagion' in America,  already a ' rogue state  'if one can be allowed to surmise by any standard, high or low.. tUSA, the only nation superstate in the world that has more than 300 military bases offshore, 50 % of which are in Muslim majority countries, and 100 % overlooking and 'policing' Muslim majority countries . The USA and its cohorts  have their dirty hands everywhere and are currently at war in Iraq, Lebanon, Sudan, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Palestine, Somalia. Thank God these 'bastards' are not in Malaysia yet but if PRU13 move south, and the new government become a shade more Islamic than what is universally comfortable, be prepared for 'some dirty hands' meddling in our affairs.

Just practically anywhere, if  the locals tend to want the 'shariah' as a way of life and there is oil  to be found in their sand ! [ At MacDonald , they serve everything for breakfast :dictators, guided democracy, pirates and goons, anything except 'syariah'.]
....and Australia, has recently joined US, as it's latest offshore 'policeman' overlooking millions of Muslims in South East Asia, with an American presence in Darwin and a willing she-poodle in Canberra !

Whether, whether, whether........??

      

By Glenn Greenwald
In one of the most egregious violations of the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech seen in quite some time, Tarek Mehanna, an American Muslim, was convicted this week in a federal court in Boston and then sentenced yesterday to 17 years in prison. He was found guilty of supporting Al Qaeda (by virtue of translating Terrorists’ documents into English and expressing “sympathetic views” to the group) as well as conspiring to “murder” U.S. soldiers in Iraq (i.e., to wage war against an invading army perpetrating an aggressive attack on a Muslim nation). I’m still traveling and don’t have much time today to write about the case itself — Adam Serwer several months ago wrote an excellent summary of why the prosecution of Mehanna is such an odious threat to free speech and more background on the case is here, and I’ve written before about the growing criminalization of free speech under the Bush and Obama DOJs, whereby Muslims are prosecuted for their plainly protected political views — but I urge everyone to read something quite amazing: Mehanna’s incredibly eloquent, thoughtful statement at his sentencing hearing, before being given a 17-year prison term.
At some point in the future, I believe history will be quite clear about who the actual criminals are in this case: not Mehanna, but rather the architects of the policies he felt compelled to battle and the entities that have conspired to consign him to a cage for two decades:
________________________

TAREK’S SENTENCING STATEMENT
APRIL 12, 2012
Read to Judge O’Toole during his sentencing, April 12th 2012.

In the name of God the most gracious the most merciful Exactly four years ago this month I was finishing my work shift at a
local hospital. As I was walking to my car I was approached by two federal agents. They said that I had a choice to make: I could do things the easy way, or I could do them the hard way. The “easy ” way, as they explained, was that I would become an informant for the government, and if I did so I would never see the inside of a courtroom or a prison cell. As for the hard way, this is it. Here I
am, having spent the majority of the four years since then in a solitary cell the size of a small closet, in which I am locked down
for 23 hours each day. The FBI and these prosecutors worked very hard-and the government spent millions of tax dollars – to put me in that cell, keep me there, put me on trial, and finally to have me stand here before you today to be sentenced to even more time in a cell.

In the weeks leading up to this moment, many people have offered suggestions as to what I should say to you. Some said I should plead for mercy in hopes of a light sentence, while others suggested I would be hit hard either way. But what I want to do is just talk about myself for a few minutes.

When I refused to become an informant, the government responded by charging me with the “crime” of supporting the mujahideen fighting the occupation of Muslim countries around the world. Or as they like to call them, “terrorists.” I wasn’t born in a Muslim country, though. I was born and raised right here in America and this angers many people: how is it that I can be an American and believe the things I believe, take the positions I take? Everything a man is exposed to in his environment becomes an ingredient that shapes his outlook, and I’m no different. So, in more ways than one, it’s because of America that I am who I am.

When I was six, I began putting together a massive collection of comic books. Batman implanted a concept in my mind, introduced me to a paradigm as to how the world is set up: that there are oppressors, there are the oppressed, and there are those who step up to defend the oppressed. This resonated with me so much that throughout the rest of my childhood, I gravitated towards any book that reflected that paradigm – Uncle Tom’s Cabin, The Autobiography of Malcolm X, and I even saw an ehical dimension to The Catcher in the Rye.
By the time I began high school and took a real history class, I was learning just how real that paradigm is in the world. I learned about the Native Americans and what befell them at the hands of European settlers. I learned about how the descendents of those European settlers were in turn oppressed under the tyranny of King George III.

I read about Paul Revere, Tom Paine, and how Americans began an armed insurgency against British forces – an insurgency we now celebrate as the American revolutionary war. As a kid I even went on school field trips just blocks away from where we sit now. I learned about Harriet Tubman, Nat Turner, John Brown, and the fight against slavery in this country. I learned about Emma Goldman, Eugene Debs, and the struggles of the labor unions, working class, and poor. I learned about Anne Frank, the Nazis, and how they persecuted minorities and imprisoned dissidents. I learned about Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King,
and the civil rights struggle.
I learned about Ho Chi Minh, and how the Vietnamese fought for decades to liberate themselves from one invader after another. I learned about Nelson Mandela and the fight against apartheid in South Africa. Everything I learned in those years confirmed what I was beginning to learn when I was six: that throughout history, there has been a constant struggle between the oppressed and their oppressors. With each struggle I learned about, I found myself consistently siding with the oppressed, and consistently respecting those who stepped up to defend them -regardless of nationality, regardless of religion. And I never threw my class notes away. As I stand here speaking, they are in a neat pile in my bedroom closet at home.

From all the historical figures I learned about, one stood out above the rest. I was impressed be many things about Malcolm X, but above all, I was fascinated by the idea of transformation, his transformation. I don’t know if you’ve seen the movie “X” by Spike Lee, it’s over three and a half hours long, and the Malcolm at the beginning is different from the Malcolm at the end. He starts off as an illiterate criminal, but ends up a husband, a father, a protective and eloquent leader for his people, a disciplined Muslim performing the Hajj in Makkah, and finally, a martyr. Malcolm’s life taught me that Islam is not something inherited; it’s not a culture or ethnicity. It’s a way of life, a state of mind anyone can choose no matter where they come from or how they were raised.
This led me to look deeper into Islam, and I was hooked. I was just a teenager, but Islam answered the question that the greatest scientific minds were clueless about, the question that drives the rich & famous to depression and suicide from being unable to answer: what is the purpose of life? Why do we exist in this Universe? But it also answered the question of how we’re supposed to exist. And since there’s no hierarchy or priesthood, I could directly and immediately begin digging into the texts of the Qur’an and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad, to begin the journey of understanding what this was all about, the implications of Islam for me as a human being, as an individual, for the people around me, for the world; and the more I learned, the more I valued Islam like a piece of gold. This was when I was a teen, but even today, despite the pressures of the last few years, I stand here before you, and everyone else in this courtroom, as a very proud Muslim.

With that, my attention turned to what was happening to other Muslims in different parts of the world. And everywhere I looked, I saw the powers that be trying to destroy what I loved. I learned what the Soviets had done to the Muslims of Afghanistan. I learned what the Serbs had done to the Muslims of Bosnia. I learned what the Russians were doing to the Muslims of Chechnya. I learned what Israel had done in Lebanon – and what it continues to do in Palestine – with the full backing of the United States. And I learned what America itself was doing to Muslims. I learned about the Gulf War, and the depleted uranium bombs that killed thousands and caused cancer rates to skyrocket across Iraq.
I learned about the American-led sanctions that prevented food, medicine, and medical equipment from entering Iraq, and how – according to the United Nations – over half a million children perished as a result. I remember a clip from a ’60 Minutes‘ interview of Madeline Albright where she expressed her view that these dead children were “worth it.” I watched on September 11th as a group of people felt driven to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings from their outrage at the deaths of these children. I watched as America then attacked and invaded Iraq directly. I saw the effects of ’Shock & Awe’ in the opening day of the invasion – the children in hospital wards with shrapnel from American missiles sticking but of their foreheads (of course, none of this was shown on CNN).

I learned about the town of Haditha, where 24 Muslims – including a 76-year old man in a wheelchair, women, and even toddlers – were shot up and blown up in their bedclothes as the slept by US Marines. I learned about Abeer al-Janabi, a fourteen-year old Iraqi girl gang-raped by five American soldiers, who then shot her and her family in the head, then set fire to their corpses. I just want to point out, as you can see, Muslim women don’t even show their hair to unrelated men. So try to imagine this young girl from a conservative village with her dress torn off, being sexually assaulted by not one, not two, not three, not four, but five soldiers. Even today, as I sit in my jail cell, I read about the drone strikes which continue to kill Muslims daily in places like Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen. Just last month, we all heard about the seventeen Afghan Muslims – mostly mothers and their kids – shot to death by an American soldier, who also set fire to their corpses.
These are just the stories that make it to the headlines, but one of the first concepts I learned in Islam is that of loyalty, of
brotherhood – that each Muslim woman is my sister, each man is my brother, and together, we are one large body who must protect each other. In other words, I couldn’t see these things beings done to my brothers & sisters – including by America – and remain neutral. My sympathy for the oppressed continued, but was now more personal, as was my respect for those defending them.

I mentioned Paul Revere – when he went on his midnight ride, it was for the purpose of warning the people that the British were marching to Lexington to arrest Sam Adams and John Hancock, then on to Concord to confiscate the weapons stored there by the Minuteman. By the time they got to Concord, they found the Minuteman waiting for them, weapons in hand. They fired at the British, fought them, and beat them. From that battle came the American Revolution. There’s an Arabic word to describe what those Minutemen did that day. That word is: JIHAD, and this is what my trial was about.
All those videos and translations and childish bickering over ‘Oh, he translated this paragraph’ and ‘Oh, he edited that sentence,’ and all those exhibits revolved around a single issue: Muslims who were defending themselves against American soldiers doing to them exactly what the British did to America. It was made crystal clear at trial that I never, ever plotted to “kill Americans” at shopping malls or whatever the story was. The government’s own witnesses contradicted this claim, and we put expert after expert up on that stand, who spent hours dissecting my every written word, who explained my beliefs. Further, when I was free, the government sent an undercover agent to prod me into one of their little “terror plots,” but I refused to participate. Mysteriously, however, the jury never heard this.

So, this trial was not about my position on Muslims killing American civilians. It was about my position on Americans killing Muslim civilians, which is that Muslims should defend their lands from foreign invaders – Soviets, Americans, or Martians. This is what I believe. It’s what I’ve always believed, and what I will always believe. This is not terrorism, and it’s not extremism. It’s what the arrows on that seal above your head represent: defense of the homeland. So, I disagree with my lawyers when they say that you don’t have to agree with my beliefs – no. Anyone with commonsense and humanity has no choice but to agree with me. If someone breaks into your home to rob you and harm your family, logic dictates that you do whatever it takes to expel that invader from your home.
But when that home is a Muslim land, and that invader is the US military, for some reason the standards suddenly change. Common sense is renamed ”terrorism” and the people defending themselves against those who come to kill them from across the ocean become “the terrorists” who are ”killing Americans.” The mentality that America was victimized with when British soldiers walked these streets 2 ½ centuries ago is the same mentality Muslims are victimized by as American soldiers walk their streets today. It’s the mentality of colonialism.

When Sgt. Bales shot those Afghans to death last month, all of the focus in the media was on him-his life, his stress, his PTSD, the mortgage on his home-as if he was the victim. Very little sympathy was expressed for the people he actually killed, as if they’re not real, they’re not humans. Unfortunately, this mentality trickles down to everyone in society, whether or not they realize it. Even with my lawyers, it took nearly two years of discussing, explaining, and clarifying before they were finally able to think outside the box and at least ostensibly accept the logic in what I was saying. Two years! If it took that long for people so intelligent, whose job it is to defend me, to de-program themselves, then to throw me in front of a randomly selected jury under the premise that they’re my “impartial peers,” I mean, come on. I wasn’t tried before a jury of my peers because with the mentality gripping America today, I have no peers. Counting on this fact, the government prosecuted me – not because they needed to, but simply because they could.

I learned one more thing in history class: America has historically supported the most unjust policies against its minorities – practices that were even protected by the law – only to look back later and ask: ’what were we thinking?’ Slavery, Jim Crow, the internment of the Japanese during World War II – each was widely accepted by American society, each was defended by the Supreme Court. But as time passed and America changed, both people and courts looked back and asked ’What were we thinking?’ Nelson Mandela was considered a terrorist by the South African government, and given a life sentence. But time passed, the world changed, they realized how oppressive their policies were, that it was not he who was the terrorist, and they released him from prison. He even became president. So, everything is subjective - even this whole business of “terrorism” and who is a “terrorist.” It all depends on the time and place and who the superpower happens to be at the moment.

In your eyes, I’m a terrorist, and it’s perfectly reasonable that I be standing here in an orange jumpsuit. But one day, America will change and people will recognize this day for what it is. They will look at how hundreds of thousands of Muslims were killed and maimed by the US military in foreign countries, yet somehow I’m the one going to prison for “conspiring to kill and maim” in those countries – because I support the Mujahidin defending those people. They will look back on how the government spent millions of dollars to imprison me as a ”terrorist,” yet if we were to somehow bring Abeer al-Janabi back to life in the moment she was being gang-raped by your soldiers, to put her on that witness stand and ask her who the “terrorists” are, she sure wouldn’t be pointing at me.

The government says that I was obsessed with violence, obsessed with ”killing Americans.” But, as a Muslim living in these times, I can think of a lie no more ironic.

-Tarek Mehanna, 

4/12/12

Related articles on the blog :


First Gulf War,
 http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2011/02/first-gulf-war-revisited.html

America, Please Go Home !
[ the best one hour interview clowns like President Bush and Lord Blair et al should listen  and give some thots to...]
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2010/11/please-americago-home.html


War of Terror, The Muslim View
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/search/label/Empire

Of Spiritual Winter, the coming of Spring, 'Mahabbah' and the Hereafter

At this juncture in my life, the feeling of 'mahabbah' is both overwhelming and fairly depressing for me.[ Arabic for 'love' for want of better words, in Malay, 'kecintaan', both 'love and kecintaaan oftentimes denote a sexual connotation. Mahabbah is not that kind of 'love'. Mahabbah for the Prophet for example .]
I see young people coming through my 'door' hanging on to dear life and out of 'political correctness'  I realise there is very little I can do to  uplift their  'spiritual winter'. Their physical hearts tottering on the verge of stopping. They seek my 'expertise'  for their physical hearts, but I know their inner hearts were in worse predicament. And most time I know they would not be hanging around for a long time. 'Mahabbah' and some degree of sadness.


I am sure all of you experience this kind of feeling at some time or other. A loss of a good friend of a different spiritual upbringing for example. For me this is happening with even more regularity, even with  mere acquientance, and lately ,even without 'loss' of  still living people I passed by in the lift, see in the clinic and meet at the market place etc and etc.


Mahabbah and some degree of sadness. Sadness in the realization that there is nothing I can do to change their ' perspective' and course.
'We are just like ships passing by in the night', even with our wives, sons and daughters and close relatives and friends !


Just yesterday a dear friend and colleague, a very senior consultant anaesthetist, excellent in his job, the very best in his field I would say. [ He gave 'gas' to a patient of mine with just a 15 % left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent a hip operation not once but twice and patient survive. The cardiologist nearly died twice of fright ! ]. A devout Hindu, he  just passed away, his whole body riddled with cancer. 


Oftentimes when I had bad 'cases' in the wee hours of the morning needing intubation and artificial ventilation, when the whole world are in deep slumber, Datuk Radha would answer his hand phone as if  'freshly awake'.
"....eeh by the way Datuk, when do you sleep ?"
"I will be there  for you in a jiffy Nik, I just finished prayer at the temple"
That was Datuk Radha, that I knew.


The week prior to his demise, he was in Sime Darby Medical Centre. Visiting him was difficult for me. Not visiting him was also difficult. The 'shahadah' was on my mind, and there dying in his bed, my friend, and I can't but looked and offer some nonsensical, meaningless niceties 
So much for 'politically correctness'.
Even if I do, decades of saying no to 'the Obvious' and His meseenger, to Him, to the Omnipotent and to His last messenger, may not change the final scenario.....................but how would I know?
I did not have the gall, the bullheadedness and the conviction to even try ! And how would I know ? 


I have 'mahabbah' for nice, excellent honest hardworking very spiritual  people like Datuk Radha.
I have 'mahabbah' also for honest non spiritual people around me.
I even have 'mahabbah' for the high brows people like the 'NFC lot' or the 'liberal lot'.....
That, in the current context of political correctness I have few option to reach them, is quite depressing  and sad for me.
Maniam, the news vendor; Richard Lim, my pious 'new born Christian' neighbour; that smiling young lady in the lift; a couple of big time CEO's. The list goes on and on, and at last almost all that 'rub' you in your everyday life.. Even a couple of'sultans' or two who seemed to be  somehow 'lost'. At this level, dangerous even just thinking about it. 
But why not for 'mahabbah', mashaallah.


I can imagine the Prophet's [ pbuh ]'mahabbah' for his uncle Abi Talib. His loss and ensuing 'depression must be a million times more. Abi Talib was his 'rock' during the early Mekkan days of Islam.
.........................................

The utube lecture down here is an excellent lecture, not exactly on the theme of 'mahabbah'  per se, by Shaykh Ninowy. But it touches it indirectly.

An excellent one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK8UeZBU32s&feature=related

Such mesmerizing lecture from this shaykh..........

I feel like crying.

Such passion and beauty.

'' When you do tawaf, you do not do it with your body, you do it with your hearts''

'' Some people come back with gifts that they bought from the bazaar, while some come back with gifts from the 'owner of the bazaar Himself !', "

Mashaallah ! In this time of gloom, I miss the Kaabah.




Related articles in the blog :
Unto Him is the journeying,
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2011/02/unto-him-is-journeying.html
True Success in Life.....Shaykh Khalid Yasin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH_vHfggaqA&feature=related
Morning has broken
 http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2011/12/morning-has-broken.html

Books : Purification of the Heart

Someone once asked A'isha, the Prophet's wife, about the most wondrous thing she observed about the Prophet [ pbuh ]. She said, " Everything about him was wondrous. But when the veiling of the night came, and when every lover went to his lover, he went to be with God. " The Prophet [ pbuh ] stood at night in prayer, remembering his Lord until his ankles swelled up and tears dripped from his beard. The Prophet [ pbuh ] said,

" Death is closer to any of you than the strap on your sandals. "

Somewhere on earth there is a door reserved for each soul, and one day each of us will walk through that door never to return to this life again. Where that door is and when we will walk through it are unknowns that we must live with. Upon death, suddenly all of this-  this whole world and all its charms and occupations-  will become as if it were all a dream :

And you will think that you tarried [ on earth ] only for a short while [ QURAN, 17 : 52 ]


Even those who are spiritually blind will see in the new world order of existence the ultimate truth about God and our purpose as His creation. And as we climb out of our graves for the mighty Gathering in the Hereafter, it would seem to us that we had stayed in our graves for only  a day or part of a day, as the Quran states.
When one is confronted with eternity, this world will seem like the most ephemeral of existences. This once overwhelmingly alluring life will be of no value to anyone.


It serve the soul to be actively aware that the door to death awaits each human  being and that it can open at any time. For this reason, the Imam says that we must keep the spectacle of death before our eyes and realize its proximity.




Excerpt from 'Purification of the Heart'
[ signs, symptoms, and cures of the spiritual disease of the heart ]
Translation and commentary of Imam al- Maulid's  MATHARAT al QULUB
by Hamza Yusuf Hanson


..........' a bloody good read', I must agree for most of us, heedless creatures, there is, creeping heedlessly on the face of this earth, rummaging  here and there,  pilling and hoarding unceasingly.


Related article in the blog:
Of Life, Dying, Death and Life after Death
http://drnikisahak.blogspot.com/2011/09/f-dying-death-and-life-after-death.html 

Masihkah Mereka Pejuang Islam ? [ new paradigm in political islam ]

This article written by Dr Maza [ Mohd Asri Zainal Abidin, former mufti of Perlis ] epitomize the current dilemma facing Islamic groups the world over with respect to their world view, Islamism and Political Islam.
I suspect much of his  present worldview has been  changed  and shaped while engaging himself with the likes of  people like Tariq Ramadan in Oxford and TJ Winter of Cambridge University.


Islam is one thing in almost predominant Muslim majority countries like Syria, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Libya, Mauritania and Afghanistan.Yet another, in  more 'plural' countries like Malaysia, where Muslims, though  still forming  the majority in term of numbers but not quite majority in term of spirit, given the onslaught of  early colonial influence and  forced influx of alien 'migrants' . In America and Europe where Muslims are distinct  small  yet ever growing minorities, it is yet another different 'animal'.


My private gut feeling  though is  that even in predominantly Muslim majority countries, 'we' are still in a 'nascent' and developing stage , more so because the political and financial elites that effectively rule them have  forcefully 'hijacked' Islam  and reintrepreted Islam in such a way that the Medinan state of the Rasullallah's time is currently unrecognisable.


When one put it that way, we must agree with Prof Tariq Ramadan of Oxford that, like the Muslims in Europe, even the born Muslims in Libya or Saudi or Tunisia  have to rediscover Islam and essentially start back from zero :
WE ARE STILL IN A STAGE OF DARUL DAKWAH.
Can forget about Darul Islam right now.....indices of Justice, Gender Equality, Fairness, and love  and care for fellow mankind [ welfare ] in Muslim countries are at all time low.

MASIHKAH MEREKA PEJUANG NEGARA ISLAM?
Prof Madya Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin
(sertai facebook DrMAZA.com dan twitter realDrMAZA)

Ramai yang menghantar mesej kepada saya meminta saya mengulas tentang kenyataan terbaru Tun Mahathir berhubung dengan hudud. Juga ada yang menyatakan saya ‘double-standard’ apabila tiba kepada Tun Mahathir saya selalu mengelakkan untuk mengulas disebabkan saya ada hubungan baik dengan beliau. 
Sebenarnya, ia disebabkan saya di UK dan baru sahaja tahu isu itu apabila dibangkit oleh rakan-rakan ‘tweet’ (not twit). Jika saya di Malaysia, mungkin saya akan hubungi Tun sendiri, tapi jarak jauh menghalang hasrat tersebut.
Asas hukum hudud disebut dalam al-Quran seperti hukum potong tangan pencuri dan sebat bagi yang menuduh orang lain berzina dan yang berzina. Kewujudan hukum tersebut dalam al-Quran memang qat’i iaitu pasti tanpa sebarang takwilan lagi, Ini disebut sebagai qat’iya thubut. 
Namun perbahasan ataupun pendetilan hukum tersebut seperti syarat-syarat hukum itu dilaksanakan, konteks perlaksanaan hukum dan segala pendetilan yang lain kebanyakannya adalah ijtihad ulama fekah. Kebanyakan ijtihad itu berasaskan kefahaman mereka terhadap nas-nas yang zanni(speculative text l zanniyyat dilalah) iaitu nas-nas al-Quran atau hadis yang mempunyai pelbagai penafsiran ataupun takwilan. Ijtihad itu terdedah kepada penilaian semula dengan menggunakan ijtihad yang lain. Berbeza pandangan dalam perkara ijtihad, bukan satu kesalahan akidah pun.

Setelah saya tonton video Tun Mahathir tersebut, saya dapati ada kesilapan dalam menggunakan istilah. Tun Mahathir mungkin memahami hudud itu sebagai perbahasan fekah berkaitan hudud, maka beliau menyatakan hudud tiada dalam al-Quran. Namun dalam masa yang sama beliau menyebut hanya ada beberapa hukum yang disebut secara umum. Di sini kesilapan beliau dalam menggunakan perkataan hudud tiada dalam al-Quran, sedangkan asas hukum tersebut memang ada dalam al-Quran. Harap Tun Mahathir dapat membetulkan kenyataan tersebut. Namun kenyataan beliau bahawa yang penting hendaklah ditegakkan keadilan, memang sedang dipakai oleh ramai ‘islamist’ di masa kini.
Siapakah Islamist
Minggu ini saya memohon dari Prof Tariq Ramadan untuk mengikuti kelas beliau ‘Political Islam, Islamism and Modern Islamic Movements’. Beliau membahaskan perkembangan golongan Islamist di Turki hari ini. Beliau meminta para pelajarnya memberikan, apakah golongan Islamist di Turki itu masih layak digelar Islamist ataupun tidak? Pelbagai pandangan diberikan oleh para pelajarnya. Kesimpulan dibiarkan terbuka. Kelas bersambung minggu hadapan. Maka saya terfikir untuk menyentuh tajuk ini dalam tulisan kali ini.

Ya, memang satu perkembangan yang menarik apabila Islamist di Turki tidak lagi melaungkan slogan perlaksanaan undang-undang syariah seperti hudud. Bahkan mereka bersedia untuk bekerja dan membangunkan negara dalam kerangka sekular (secular framework). Mereka menegak nilai-nilai Islam seperti ketelusan, amanah, berdisiplin dan lain-lain. Mereka tidak mengubah perlembagaan, sebaliknya bekerja dan memberi nafas kepada Islam dalam kerangka yang ada, tanpa menzahirkan perjuangan menentang secularism. 
Isu hijab (tudung) di universiti di Turki yang tidak dibenar sebelum ini diatasi dengan perlantikan pentadbiran yang mempunyai lebih luas tentang undang-undang tersebut. Sehingga John L. Esposito dalam The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islamic World di bawah tajuk secularism menafsirkan perkembangan Islamist di Turki sebenarnya bukan pertarungan antara Islamism dan secularism, tetapi sebenarnya pertarungan dalam menafsirkan konsep secularism itu sendiri. Ia antara versi secular Anglo-American yang memberikan ruang kepada penglibatan agama dalam politik dibandingkan pemahaman French secularism yang bersifat keras terhadap agama dengan menganggap penglibatan agama akan mengancam social order. Maka, Esposito melihat Islamist di Turki itu berpihak kepada secularism versi Anglo-American.
Hari ini selepas ‘Arab Spring’, gerakan Islam di kebanyakan Negara Arab sudah mula bekerjasama dengan parti-parti lain yang tidak berasaskan Islam. Kerjasama itu sekaligus menjadikan mereka menggugurkan isu ‘Islamic State’ khususnya perlaksanaan hudud. Hal yang sama kita lihat di Malaysia. Ini menimbulkan perbahasan sarjana semasa di Barat dan Timur, apakah mereka itu masih dianggap sebagai Islamist atau mereka sebenarnya ‘post-Islamist’?
Pertamanya, istilah Islamist atau Islamism itu apakah maksudnya? Secara umum, perkataan islamist difahami di Barat khususnya kelompok yang memperjuangkan politik Islam. Mereka ini berhasrat menegakkan Negara Islam yang melaksanakan undang-undang Islam khususnya hudud. Jika maksud ini dipakai, maka kelihatannya kebanyakan gerakan Islam hari ini bukan lagi Islamist seperti yang difahami oleh Barat. 
Namun jika istilah Islamist diberikan kepada mereka yang cuba menjadi muslim yang baik dalam kehidupan harian, mengamalkan nilai-nilai Islam dalam kehidupan individunya seperti amanah dalam pentadbiran, maka mereka ini masih lagi islamist. Jika disoal secara lebih jelas, apakah mereka ini pejuang Negara Islam versi lama mereka ataupun Negara Islam versi hudud? Jawapannya, kelihatan pada kemungkinan dan realiti, mereka bukan lagi pejuang Negara Islam versi berkenaan.
Post-Islamism
Asef Bayat dalam tulisannya “The Coming of a Post-Islamist Society” menggunakan istilah post-islamism merujuk kepada golongan Islamist di Iran. Beliau menyifatkan golongan post-islamist ini ialah mereka yang cuba mengadunkan semula antara Islam dan realiti dunia masa kini khususnya yang membabitkan soal kebebasan hak individu, demokrasi dan kemodenan. Beliau menyebut: 

“Post- Islamism is expressed in the idea of fusion between Islam (as a personalized faith) and individual freedom and choice; and post-Islamism is associated with the values of democracy and aspects of modernity”

Mengapa ini berlaku? Kesemua ini berlaku disebabkan pengalaman yang dilalui oleh gerakan Islam menunjukkan kegagalan dalam banyak perkara untuk melaksanakan slogan-slogan yang dilaungkan sebelum ini. Realiti politik dunia menunjukkan banyak slogan mereka sebelum ini lebih berbentuk retorik yang tidak dapat dilaksanakan. Negara seperti yang mereka baca dalam kitab-kitab lama itu sudah tidak wujud. Sudah tiada lagi Negara Khalifah. Nation State ataupun negara bangsa hari ini mempunyai realiti yang berbeza. 
Globalisasi pula sedang menghakiskan ciri-ciri nation state yang ada. Hari ini perkaitan antara politik dan ekonomi amatlah jelas. Dunia terbuka era teknologi juga mengubah terlalu banyak perkara. Hal ini akan lebih jelas terasa apabila golongan Islamist itu sendiri mendapat kekuasaan seperti di Turki dan juga beberapa Negara Arab yang baru diperolehi.
Maka, selama ini mereka mungkin telah melihat nas-nas politik dalam Islam itu di luar dari konteks yang sepatutnya ataupun decontextualization of nas. Mereka mungkin hanya membaca nas tanpa melihat konteks dan realiti yang wujud dipersekitaran nas. Tidak mengkaji rentak ruang yang mana nas-nas itu beroperasi (tempo-spatial contexts). Sedangkan dalam memahami nas, persekitaran ekonomi dan politik (economic and political milieu) yang wujud semasa nas-nas politik Madinah itu lahir hendaklah diambil.
Nabi s.a.w mengambil kira persoalan persekitaran politik ataupun realiti yang ada dalam perlaksanaan pemerintahan. Justeru itu, baginda tidak mengarahkan Najasyi Raja Habsyah yang menganut Islam itu untuk memerintah sama seperti kerajaan Nabi s.a.w di Madinah. Najasyi atau Ashamah bin Abjar mengelapai kerajaan Kristian. Maka, realitinya berbeza. Nabi s.a.w tidak mempersalahkannya disebabkan ruang yang terhad yang dia ada. Tidak pula disuruh dia meninggalkan jawatannya. Sebaliknya memuji ketelusan yang digunakan dalam ruang yang ada. Bahkan apabila Najasyi meninggal, Nabi s.a.w menyebut: 

“Telah mati pada hari ini seorang lelaki soleh. Bangunlah dan bersolatlah ke atas saudara kamu Ashamah (nama Najasyi)”. (Riwayat al-Bukhari). 

Demikian juga Nabi Yusuf yang bergerak dalam ruangan politik yang ada di zaman baginda.
Gerakan Islam mula rasional dan akur bahawa mereka mesti memahami text dan context. Jika perubahan dalam pendekatan dan kefahaman mereka kini dianggap tidak Islamik oleh sesetengah pihak, maka itu satu penafsiran yang dangkal. Realitinya, dunia Islam berhajatkan kepada pemerintah yang cekap, amanah, adil serta berjaya menghidupkan kebahagiaan rakyat. Jika gerakan Islam berjaya melakukan hal itu, maka itu satu kejayaan.




.....................................................................................................................................






from Nadzru Azahari, Jakarta




.

Dear Nik Hawk,

Thanks indeed. This is the stuff that I love to read and share. Have lots more of this to share. It makes my day.
Not for me is ' mounafique et sa mounaficite', 'touwba nasouha and its of manual of practice', ' studies in islamisation of knowledge', ' practice and methods of imbibation of islamic values', ' alternative medicine of the Prophet', ' 30 best du'as for good health and wealth' and the like.


Wassalaam

Nadzru

.................................................................